ABB’s analysis discovered firms had been most motivated to undertake drive and motor modernization tasks to enhance efficiency and reliability (in line with 48% of respondents), cut back power consumption or working prices (40%), and allow new capabilities corresponding to situation monitoring (34%).
“The choice to improve or substitute [drives and motion control systems] is extremely depending on the precise circumstances of every set up,” mentioned Oswald Deuchar, international head of the modernization program for ABB Movement Providers. “We should think about the age, situation and upkeep historical past of the drive. If its core elements are in good situation, then upgrading represents a cost-efficient and sustainable possibility.”
The state of present infrastructure serves as one other driving issue. “An improve may be the higher possibility if substantial modifications are required to implement a brand new drive, corresponding to new cabling, foundations, flooring reinforcements and air-con,” Deuchar added.
Conversely, full alternative turns into the popular possibility when legacy programs can now not meet the required efficiency, security or integration requirements, mentioned Marc Konrad, head of world buyer companies for movement management, at Siemens. “Producers ought to assess the structural situation of present tools, the provision of spare elements, and the compatibility with trendy digitalization and cybersecurity necessities,” he defined.
The open platform method
The continuing shift to an open industrial panorama, together with evolving open requirements for communications, networking and enterprise utility integration, helps producers steadily merge legacy drive and movement management tools into the rising Trade 4.0 world order.
