Saturday, January 17, 2026

Can Congress rein in Trump on Greenland?


However the nation Donald Trump has fixated on most isn’t an adversary — it’s an ally. Greenland, a NATO member and longtime accomplice of the USA has repeatedly discovered itself within the president’s crosshairs.

These threats, delivered largely by unilateral govt motion, have as soon as once more raised questions on Congress’s function as a examine on presidential energy. And with Trump in his ultimate time period, even some Republicans are exhibiting small however notable indicators of concern.

At the moment, Defined co-host Astead Herndon spoke with Annie Grayer, a senior reporter at CNN, about how Capitol Hill is responding — and the place these fractures contained in the GOP could also be heading.

Under is an excerpt of their dialog, edited for size and readability. There’s far more within the full episode, so take heed to At the moment, Defined wherever you get podcasts, together with Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify.

Will we count on extra Republicans breaking extra with Trump to vary now that it’s 2026 and never 2025?

Effectively, definitely Republicans understand it’s an election yr. The highlight is on them, and I believe we’re beginning to see some openings for cracks. However I put so many caveats there as a result of every time we predict there might be a gap for an actual Republican break up, as we noticed play out on the Hill with the warfare powers vote, Trump and his workforce are actually good at maintaining Republicans in line by a private and non-private stress marketing campaign.

However his skill to do this goes to get more and more harder as Republicans begin campaigning and have to determine run on what Republicans in Congress have executed to this point. There are loads of moderates who’re trying on the calendar, taking a look at what’s coming in 2026 and know that they should carve out their very own lane right here.

Trump’s international interventionism undoubtedly looks as if the newest flash level within the GOP relationship with him. We did see 5 Republicans break with the White Home and help that warfare powers decision. What modified?

A whole lot of Republicans had been publicly saying, I absolutely help how this operation went down and that this doesn’t want an intervention from Congress. Clearly behind the scenes there have been 5 Republican senators who felt very strongly this truly does require an act of Congress and congressional intervention. What we noticed play out is Trump’s true stress marketing campaign and what it means to be a Republican in Donald Trump’s social gathering.

Instantly after the vote, Trump took to Fact Social and name-checked all 5 of these Republicans and stated they shouldn’t be elected to Congress once more. These are members of his personal social gathering. Now, a few of these Republican senators are in opposition to Trump, like Sens. Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski or Susan Collins, however Todd Younger and Josh Hawley — that basically took the president and his workforce abruptly. So these had been the 2 that they targeted on, considering that they had been going to be those they may peel off.

However what we noticed right here was the function that Secretary Rubio performed, who’s a former senator, who has private relationships with all of those people and was capable of sit with these senators, give them extra info and provides them assurances on their pink line. Each Todd Younger and Josh Hawley stated that their pink line was they didn’t need boots on the bottom in Venezuela.

So Republicans did get one thing out of it. However you’ll be able to ask your self what actually modified, and it truly is the full-court press that these Republicans obtained from Trump and his workforce.

What have Republican members in Congress been saying in regards to the army use of power in Greenland?

So Greenland, we’re seeing a fair larger break probably than what we noticed with Venezuela and from a solid of characters that aren’t the same old critics of Trump.

Republican senators particularly are kind of like, what are we doing right here with Greenland? Actually individuals are not on board with army power: the speaker of the Home, the chief of the Republican Senate, have stated army motion in Greenland wouldn’t be a good suggestion.

After which even in relation to the acquisition of Greenland, you may have the chair of the Senate Armed Companies Committee, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS), who got here out of a gathering with Danish officers and stated, we shouldn’t be speaking in regards to the buy of Greenland. That’s not what these officers need.

And there’s loads of Republicans, much more so privately who I’m speaking to who’re type of hoping that Trump isn’t severe about this. And so I believe Republicans try to not get forward of the place the president is right here. They don’t wish to draw a agency line till they see precisely what Trump goes to do. However there’s this kind of trepidation on this kind of, I don’t know, perhaps even quiet finger crossing that Trump goes to drop this, he’s going to maneuver on, and that what he’s saying about Greenland isn’t truly going to come back to fruition.

Is there any type of willingness for Congress to reign in that energy proper now, if we predict even past the warfare powers decision? How a lot is there dialogue of Congress’s personal function? How a lot are members speaking about that?

It’s an enormous subject of dialog.I believe that’s why the warfare powers decision votes had been such an enormous deal as a result of this query is entrance and middle for each Democrats and Republicans. That is now not a partisan query, however that is about defending the establishment of Congress, the legislative department, and in relation to the international intervention.

Extra particularly, once I’ve been asking this query to Republicans, they’re pointing to quite a lot of examples in current historical past that present that the degradation of Congress, particularly in relation to warfare powers, has been taking place for a very long time. In case you return to Obama and the bombing of Libya and going into Pakistan to get Osama bin Laden, these had been issues that occurred with out congressional approval.

And so sure, what’s taking place proper now could be placing an actual highlight on the difficulty. However I believe for individuals to essentially perceive this, we have now to go method again. That is one thing that Congress has kind of been ceding energy little by little, and it finds us on this potential disaster that we’re in now.

And I believe the true query that I proceed to ask in my reporting, and I nonetheless don’t discover a solution to, is what will be the pink line that will get individuals to truly say, okay, sufficient is sufficient.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles