15+ AI Fashions Which are Smarter Than You

The common human IQ is 100. Statistical truth – not an insult. For many years, that quantity has quietly outlined what we meant by “regular intelligence.” However in 2025, one thing unusual is occurring. Machines with no consciousness, no feelings, and no lived expertise are actually scoring increased than people on the very exams designed to measure human intelligence. Does that imply AI fashions, particularly the newest ones like Gemini 3 and GPT-5.2, are smarter than most of us people?

A number of massive language fashions have been examined on IQ-style benchmarks over the previous yr. These embody logic puzzles, summary reasoning exams, sample recognition duties, and problem-solving challenges. The outcomes are arduous to disregard. Mannequin after mannequin is matching, and in lots of instances surpassing, the efficiency of a median human. Not in a selected activity, however throughout a number of dimensions of reasoning that IQ exams care about.

This text appears at 15+ AI fashions which might be smarter than you, no less than by IQ-style requirements. We’ll break down what “good” actually means right here, how these fashions are evaluated, and why this shift issues.

First, let’s determine how…

…Can We Assign IQ to an AI?

Strictly talking, we can’t. IQ was designed to measure human intelligence, formed by biology, expertise, and consciousness. An AI doesn’t assume, really feel, or perceive the world the best way people do. So, assigning it a literal IQ rating can be scientifically incorrect.

However in observe, these comparisons are made a tad bit otherwise.

Mainly, as an alternative of asking whether or not an AI has an IQ, researchers examine how an AI mannequin performs on AI-related duties. Think about a system persistently fixing logic puzzles, pattern-recognition duties, and reasoning issues that people with an IQ of 120 or 130 sometimes remedy. If the AI mannequin does so reliably, it turns into affordable to map its efficiency to an equal IQ vary, proper?

And that’s precisely how we affiliate IQ with an AI mannequin.

This isn’t a psychological prognosis. Consider it as a efficiency benchmark. IQ right here acts as a shared language, or a technique to examine how properly totally different methods motive underneath managed situations. And by that yardstick, a number of trendy LLMs are already working properly above the human common.

Which IQ Checks Consider AI Fashions?

These are basic IQ exams, or no less than the net variations of them. The duties inside these challenges measure reasoning, abstraction, and problem-solving fairly than memorisation. These exams are both straight tailored from human IQ exams or carefully mimic the identical cognitive expertise.

As an example, probably the most widespread IQ exams is Raven’s Progressive Matrices. This can be a visible pattern-recognition check that’s lengthy thought of culture-fair. A number of LLMs now remedy these puzzles at or above the extent of high-IQ people. Then there are Mensa-style logic exams, which embody sequence completion, image reasoning, and deductive logic. Fashionable AI fashions have proven persistently robust efficiency in these.

Nonetheless, language-heavy sections of IQ exams are the place LLMs actually shine. Verbal reasoning, analogies, and arithmetic issues, much like WAIS subtests, play on to their strengths. On high of that, trendy benchmarks like BIG-Bench Arduous, ARC-style reasoning duties, and tutorial evaluations akin to MMLU and Humanity’s Final Examination function sensible stand-ins for IQ testing. Whereas they don’t seem to be labelled as “IQ exams,” they measure the identical underlying talents. The necessary half – LLMs are more and more outperforming nearly all of people on these exams.

See for your self.

High-rated AI fashions on IQ exams

For this specific checklist, we will focus particularly on the Mensa Norway exams, and rank the AI fashions as per their rating.

1. GPT-5.2 Professional

Mensa Norway IQ: 147

That is the basis of this whole dialogue of AI fashions and their IQs. Not too long ago marking its debut, GPT-5.2 Professional has now crushed the all-time IQ rating for LLMs. Its rating – 147. As Derya Unutmaz mentions in his tweet, this type of intelligence is present in “solely lower than 1 in 1000 individuals.”

GPT-5.2 Professional persistently demonstrates this supremacy over people. Particularly so for multi-step logic, summary reasoning, and professional-grade downside fixing. Whereas it doesn’t essentially imply it’s smarter than people in all points, it does point out a strong shift in the place the higher bounds of test-measured intelligence now sit.

2. GPT-5.2 Pondering

Mensa Norway IQ: 141

Subsequent up is the pondering sibling of the newly launched GPT-5.2. On the Mensa Norway IQ check, GPT-5.2 Pondering scores round 141, inserting it properly past the human common of 100 and comfortably above the standard Mensa qualification threshold. In human phrases, this rating corresponds to the highest 1–2% of the inhabitants, purely on summary reasoning and sample recognition.

What this outcome really tells us may be very particular. GPT-5.2 Pondering performs exceptionally properly on duties that require figuring out relationships, recognizing visible or logical patterns, and making use of constant guidelines throughout a number of steps. These are the precise talents IQ exams are designed to isolate, impartial of language, emotion, or area data.

This mainly implies that, so far as structured reasoning underneath managed situations is worried, GPT-5.2 Pondering operates at a degree most people by no means attain.

3. Gemini 3 Professional Preview

Mensa Norway IQ: 141

Proper alongside GPT-5.2 Pondering sits Gemini 3 Professional Preview, matching its Mensa Norway IQ rating completely. This locations Google’s flagship reasoning mannequin firmly in elite territory, far above the human baseline and properly previous the brink sometimes related to excessive mental means.

In sensible phrases, it means Gemini 3 Professional Preview performs reliably on summary reasoning challenges. Such exams normally require rule discovery, sample continuation, and logical elimination. These are issues the place guessing fails shortly. You’ll be able to solely rating this excessive with structured inference.

This rating thus displays Gemini 3 Professional Preview’s energy in managed reasoning environments.

4. Grok 4 Skilled Mode

Mensa Norway IQ: 137

In fact, you possibly can’t converse of intelligence and maintain an Elon Musk-backed product out of the checklist. Shut behind the highest scorers sits Grok 4 Skilled Mode. Whereas barely decrease than the very high tier, the mannequin is properly throughout the vary of remarkable human intelligence and comfortably above the typical benchmark of 100.

The rating highlights Grok 4 Skilled Mode’s means to deal with logic-driven duties with readability and management. It performs properly on sample recognition, summary relationships, and elimination-based reasoning – the core parts of IQ-style exams.

In easy phrases, Grok 4 Skilled Mode demonstrates robust analytical reasoning underneath check situations. Whereas it might not high the chart, its efficiency confirms that it operates far past human-average reasoning ranges when evaluated purely on logic and pattern-based intelligence.

5. GPT-5.2 Professional (Imaginative and prescient)

Mensa Norway IQ: 135

Not far behind its text-only counterpart is GPT-5.2 Professional Imaginative and prescient, scoring 135 on the Mensa Norway check. This nonetheless locations it firmly throughout the vary of very excessive human intelligence. That is properly above each the worldwide common and the standard threshold related to superior reasoning means.

Notice that this rating comes from a vision-enabled mannequin – an AI mannequin that may course of and motive over visible info (like enter photos), and never simply textual content. This implies GPT-5.2 Professional Imaginative and prescient performs strongly on summary reasoning duties even when visible interpretation is required.

Now think about an AI so clever that it scores a 135 on the IQ check, even after deciphering advanced photos and visible patterns. Up till a few years again, we might’ve thought it to be solely doable in a sci-fi film.

6. GPT-5.2

Mensa Norway IQ: 126

After the Professional and Pondering fashions are completed with, OpenAI’s newest commonplace mannequin takes the stage. However thoughts you, it’s under no circumstances much less in relation to intelligence, particularly so compared with people. A rating of 126 already locations it above roughly 98% of the human inhabitants, firmly separating it from what we contemplate common human reasoning means.

This rating displays GPT-5.2’s energy in dealing with basic IQ-style duties akin to sample recognition, logical sequencing, and rule-based downside fixing. Whereas it doesn’t push into the intense higher ranges like its Professional or Pondering variants, it stays persistently robust throughout structured reasoning challenges.

In sensible phrases, GPT-5.2 represents the purpose the place AI reasoning clearly crosses into elite human territory. It could not high the charts, however even at this degree, it outperforms the overwhelming majority of individuals on managed intelligence exams.

7. Kimi K2 Pondering

Mensa Norway IQ: 124

Subsequent up is Kimi K2 Pondering, a mannequin that won’t seize headlines as loudly as some Western counterparts. But, it nonetheless resonates amongst AI lovers globally, and for good motive. A rating of 124 clearly reveals it above the human common, and properly into the vary related to robust analytical means.

This outcome highlights Kimi K2 Pondering’s functionality on structured reasoning duties. In sensible phrases, Kimi K2 Pondering demonstrates that high-level summary reasoning is now not restricted to a small group of flagship fashions. Even exterior absolutely the high scorers, trendy LLMs are actually persistently working above common human intelligence on standardised exams. Is it a development? Or a truth ready to be established? We will discover out in time.

8. Claude Opus 4.5

Mensa Norway IQ: 124

Matching Kimi K2 Pondering is Claude Opus 4.5, Anthropic’s flagship reasoning mannequin, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 124. That’s smarter than the human common, and a agency indicator of robust analytical and problem-solving means.

The rating displays Claude Opus 4.5’s competence on summary reasoning duties that demand consistency and logical management. That means – Claude Opus 4.5 demonstrates that sturdy, human-above-average reasoning, even exterior the top-tier LLMs.

9. Gemini 3 Professional Preview (Imaginative and prescient)

Mensa Norway IQ: 123

Only a step under its text-only counterpart sits Gemini 3 Professional Preview Imaginative and prescient, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 123. This rating is much more notable because it comes from a vision-enabled mannequin. Which implies Gemini 3 Professional Preview Imaginative and prescient is required to interpret visible patterns and relationships earlier than making use of logic.

In different phrases, the shift from text-only to vision-based inputs doesn’t decrease its reasoning efficiency. Even underneath tougher-than-usual situations, it continues to carry out at a degree most people don’t attain on standardised intelligence exams.

10. Claude Sonnet 4.5

Mensa Norway IQ: 123

Sharing the identical Mensa Norway IQ rating of 123 is Claude Sonnet 4.5, Anthropic’s extra balanced reasoning mannequin. Whereas not positioned as essentially the most excessive thinker within the lineup, it comfortably outperforms the human baseline by way of logical reasoning means.

The outcome displays Claude Sonnet 4.5’s regular efficiency on structured problem-solving duties. You might need to notice that even in a extra environment friendly kind, Sonnet 4.5 exceeds the reasoning capabilities of most people.

11. GPT-5.2 Pondering (Imaginative and prescient)

Mensa Norway IQ: 111

Let me be clear right here: an IQ-style check is unforgiving to vision-enabled methods. Earlier than a mannequin can apply motive for an answer, and get a excessive rating, it should first accurately interpret shapes, patterns, and spatial relationships. Basically, that is precisely how we people interpret info. We see, interpret, after which motive. Nonetheless, doing so for AI is a complete different activity in itself.

So, by any means, don’t consider GPT-5.2 Pondering Imaginative and prescient’s IQ rating of 111 as commonplace by any means. It mainly implies that this mannequin is doing one thing tougher: pondering whereas seeing. A single mistake made in interpretation will certainly trickle right down to the answer.

GPT-5.2 Pondering Imaginative and prescient thus doesn’t chase elite summary scores. Nonetheless, it demonstrates one thing a lot, far more necessary: usable intelligence in messy, multimodal environments. And as AI strikes nearer to the true world, that will simply be essentially the most fascinating function in an AI mannequin, if not already.

12. Manus

Mensa Norway IQ: 111

Sitting at an IQ rating of 111 is Manus, a mannequin that proves intelligence doesn’t all the time imply “excessive.” A rating like this already locations Manus above the human common, however extra importantly, it indicators reliable reasoning and consistency.

Which mainly implies that it might not remedy the toughest puzzles at file velocity, nevertheless it avoids the sorts of breakdowns that always plague weaker fashions. That is usable intelligence at its greatest.

13. GPT-4o

Mensa Norway IQ: 109

With a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 109, GPT-4o sits simply above the human common. Whereas this will likely appear modest in comparison with the fashions increased up the checklist, it nonetheless marks a transparent departure from what was thought of “succesful” AI not too way back.

This rating displays GPT-4o’s means to deal with primary summary reasoning and sample recognition with out falling aside. It could not excel at advanced multi-step puzzles, nevertheless it performs reliably on less complicated logic duties. That is precisely what most people, together with myself, want for on a regular basis downside fixing.

In a manner, this represents accessible intelligence. Whereas it’s not constructed to dominate IQ charts, it reveals how AI fashions can barely exceed common human reasoning and be useful with our each day duties.

14. DeepSeek R1

Mensa Norway IQ: 109

Matching GPT-4o is DeepSeek R1, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 109. Like GPT-4o, that is competing reasoning, accessible to people across the globe. All of it, with none sharp drop-offs as seen in much less succesful methods.

In easy phrases, you could contemplate DeepSeek R1 as reliable baseline intelligence. It reveals that even fashions not designed for peak reasoning efficiency can nonetheless meet, and barely exceed, common human reasoning on standardised IQ-style exams.

15. Llama 4 Maverick

Mensa Norway IQ: 107

With a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 107, Llama 4 Maverick sits barely above the typical human baseline. At least, it depicts a degree of intelligence that’s meaningfully higher than probability or shallow sample matching.

Consider Llama 4 Maverick as an entry-level reasoning competence amongst trendy LLMs. It reveals that even fashions not designed for superior problem-solving may be of use for people in duties which might be past the capabilities of a median human.

16. DeepSeek V3

Mensa Norway IQ: 103

Closing the checklist is DeepSeek V3, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 103. This locations the mannequin simply solely simply above the human common IQ. It additionally implies that the DeepSeek V3 can deal with elementary sample recognition and easy logical relationships with out main errors.

That is the decrease sure of what trendy LLMs can now obtain on intelligence benchmarks. Even at this degree, the takeaway is evident: AI methods have crossed the brink the place common human reasoning is now not the bar to clear – it’s the baseline.

What This Record Implies

Don’t consider this checklist as a leaderboard indicating the neatest AI fashions. Whereas it does so in a manner, the rating just isn’t an absolute illustration of smartness in any manner.

Its actual worth lies elsewhere – it makes a robust level that structured reasoning is now not restricted to people. Throughout fashions, architectures, and organisations, AI methods are actually matching, and infrequently exceeding, human efficiency on IQ exams that had been as soon as thought of tough even for skilled people.

That mentioned, the context right here will all the time be restricted. This rating doesn’t indicate creativity, consciousness, or human-like understanding. These fashions don’t possess intent, feelings, or self-awareness. They don’t “assume” in the best way people do. What they show with their respective scores as an alternative is one thing far narrower, but profound. AI can now remedy summary, logic-driven issues simply as properly, if not higher, than people.

Conclusion

This text just isn’t meant to touch upon the intelligence warfare of AI vs people. It merely proves one level – human-level reasoning is now not the ceiling. This checklist reveals how shortly massive language fashions have crossed thresholds that after outlined distinctive intelligence, no less than in test-measured phrases.

On the identical time, these scores remind us what intelligence isn’t. They don’t indicate creativity, consciousness, or understanding. What they do present is that structured reasoning has change into low-cost, quick, and scalable. And because of that, the true differentiator shifts again to people. We are able to now resolve what issues to resolve, as an alternative of the right way to remedy them.